Not sure what is meant by reusable test scripts, but if the scripts are used somewhere else that has the exact same functionality and uses the same xas requests, then probably yes.Ĭan you also use HTTP header recorder instead of Blazemeter? Some of those ids (the dynamic ones) need to be replaced with the correct values at runtime, as shown on the webinar demos. No, when JMeter records the scripts, it records the requests the ids used at the time of the requests, and those values will be static in the script. How does the Blazemeterrecorder handle Mendix ’s random generated ids? Is it easy to create reusable test scripts? Denormalizing the data in these scenarios (needing data from many associated entities) still helps performance. with the associated entities?Īlthough it ’s not as relevant due to the performance improvements from the reduction of HTTP requests- it ’s still relevant as in the example scenario of this webinar, as there are still multiple requests to the database in the background. Is normalizing data still as relevant in 7.21% 2B and how is it kept in sync. When doing load testing you should use the same environment as you would use in production, or else the tests are not realistic and run the risk of having different results in production. Should we use Acceptance environment for testing? The configuration of production and the test environment should be the same for load testing, but not sure if that is the scenario every time. It ’s natural that a slower device will take longer to render the results. HTTP request time is 1 second and rendering time is 2 seconds – total time is 3 seconds). And that time can be added to the time the HTTP requests take (e.g. As for the influence of the device, that affects mainly the rendering time. high-end) you test on the influence the results?Īll the tests shown are based on HTTP requests only. If not, then I don ’t bother with them.Īre the tests you showed browser-client side or server side? And how much does the device (slow vs. If those random numbers are required for the subsequent requests (correlations), then yes.
Sometimes in xas request handlers, there are random numbers. These tools allow you to run on a distributed configuration, where you can have multiple load servers executing the requests. What if you need distributed load tests when a large number of users? These can run on on-premises servers or in the cloud. It has been the 'king' of open source load testing tools for a long time, and probably still is. It is old and has acquired a larger feature set, more integrations, add-ons, plugins, etc than any other tool in this review. JMeter, Load Runner, Storm Runner depends on what the customer uses. Jmeter is a huge beast compared to most other tools. However, if you need to use client-side logic (like nanoflows) to manipulate your NPEs, then, depending on the situation, you might have to use browser-based testing. As long as you pass the data you need with your requests to the Mendix server, you should be able to use HTTP load testing. If you use a lot of NPEs in your user interfaces I'm guessing you would have to use browser-based testing, correct?
#Neoload vs jmeter update#
When you update the normalized entities, you also update the flat/denormalized entity. How do you maintain the redundant, flattened data on the parent entity?
The option to extend your test data further with top-tier APM solution integrations like AppDynamics, Dynatrace, CA APM, New Relic and CloudWatch.The ability to test from multiple geo-locations - no need to worry about test and report synchronization.Easy access to historical reports for comparison.The ability to generate up to 1,000,000 (or even more!) virtual users - no need to worry about infrastructure cost and setup.A simple way to maintain and execute JMeter scripts from one location.'On-the-fly' script recording with the BlazeMeter Chrome Extension.This means it's not only 100% compatible with JMeter - but it also addresses its limitations like scalability, stability and reporting. People familiar with JMeter know that it's one of the best open source performance testing tools available on today's market.īut no tool is foolproof and there are always pros and cons to be found with each one.īlazeMeter is 'JMeter in the cloud'.
0 kommentar(er)
